The provision of housing space became the most urgent task: The planning of 17 new settlements on the fringes of the destroyed city began at the same time as the demolition work and rubble clearance. The goal of this first reconstruction phase was to ensure that a large proportion of the population would have a fixed abode by winter. The settlements were to consist of prefabricated, mostly single-story houses; the first deliveries of prefabricated elements arrived in Skopje only ten days after the earthquake. Three months later, the construction work in the “montazni naselbi” (montage settlements) was fully underway and 10,000 dwelling units were handed over in December. By the end of 1964, a total of 14,068 dwelling units had been built that provided around 70,000 people with a new home.

The construction of prefabricated houses, several of which were even furnished, offered a number of countries an opportunity to provide reconstruction aid in a clearly visible and identifiable way. While most of the houses were produced in Yugoslavia, the roughly 2.500 houses that were sent from other countries - 914 of them as gifts - have been inscribed in the city’s collective consciousness.

The architectural import of these prefabricated houses has lastingly shaped the face of the city. After being inhabited for more than 50 years and despite undergoing repeated extensions and transformations, the basic structure of the settlements and the elements of the architecture from Finland, Mexico, or the USA still remain visible. The growing, prefabricated houses of Skopje have become the dense fabric of the city.

PRE/FABRIC undertakes a search for traces in this little researched chapter of the history of the Macedonian capital. Using six houses as examples, the biography of their construction and the residents’ experiences of their housing are looked at. It is the residents of the reconstructed city who, through the way in which they have used these buildings over the years and have optimally adapted the building fabric to meet very personal needs, question modernism’s optimistic belief in industrial production and the possibilities of prefabrication. The documentation and analysis of the domestic landscapes that developed through interventions, adaptations and extensions reveal these questions.